Use the QB who played—or the confirmed starter
Week 1 participation replaces preseason guesses first. Fresh team and local news then overrides it when a coach names an injury replacement.
Sept. 11–12 / Week 2
Every lined FBS-vs-FBS game now carries the same coverage as Week 1: market numbers, All-Takes sides and totals, projected scores, SP+, CFBPredictor, Cover 3 and a fixed slot for each local perspective.
Week 2 replay · 2017–2025
58.2%ATSThe policy changed 99 historical Week 2 predictions and improved average spread error from 11.957 to 11.920 points. It earned +11.9 units at standard −110 pricing and finished profitable in 6 of 9 seasons.
This is historical research against an archived current-line proxy for the original Week 2 policy. It supports a selective move off the market, while the exact record remains too small to promise the same future win rate. The matchup additions have their own research record below. The reviewed Oregon adjustment sits outside this replay and will be graded separately.
Matchup additions · Week 2
63.5%55 historical betsAcross 2020–2025, these additional Week 2 selections won 63.5% of settled bets and earned +11.0 units at assumed −110 odds. Across all weeks, the rule added 963 selections: 530–413–20, or 56.2%, with +68.8 units and a profit in all six seasons.
Efficiency and line play supplied the clearest evidence. Earlier tests helped shape this model, and the Week 2 sample contains only 52 settled bets; these are research results rather than a live record or a win probability for today’s picks.
The additions use the frozen matchup forecast and require at least one point of edge at the named book. Similar-game comparisons provide context and do not change the recommendation or its size.
How Week 1 changes the number
The Week 2 update measures how each team played before garbage time, adjusts for possessions and opponent quality, then checks whether efficiency, success rate and line play support the score. The additional matchup picks examine offensive and defensive unit profiles in games the original policy passed.
Week 1 participation replaces preseason guesses first. Fresh team and local news then overrides it when a coach names an injury replacement.
Opponent-adjusted efficiency, success rate and line play help separate durable performance from a few volatile plays.
The model can back a team the market has not fully rewarded or fade a move that ran beyond the football evidence.
QB evidence, coaching changes and roster turnover describe uncertainty without automatically deleting a bet.
How to read the board
Each matchup starts with the saved spread and total, our projected score and the published SP+ score. Below that are explicit ATS and total calls, any All-Takes recommendation detail, the published Cover 3 picks, the locked CFBPredictor projection and one fixed slot for each local perspective.
Lines retrieved Sep 8, 9:29 PM EDT · SP+ and CFBPredictor retrieved Sept. 10 · outside-source check through Sept. 11, 2026
Availability audit
23/49matchups fully clearedEach matchup now requires four searches per team: general injury news, the named quarterback, coach availability comments and a Covers check. A clean Covers page never clears a team by itself.
The audit is intentionally strict: only a completed review inside the final 72 hours and before kickoff counts. Rutgers’ missed quarterback change is logged as a post-kickoff finding, so it diagnoses the gap without rewriting the original card.
The board
All 49 lined FBS-vs-FBS games in chronological order: 23 ATS picks, 26 side passes and 32 totals bets. Empty outside-pick slots remain visible rather than being treated as consensus.
Week 2 slate
Final · Rutgers 21 · Boston College 28
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 52.4 points, 1.9 from the 54.3 market consensus.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Rutgers 28, Boston College 27, with Rutgers at 53.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Rutgers 31, Boston College 30: Rutgers by 1.0, with a 52.3% win probability. Against its captured Boston College −3 line, the model gap favors Rutgers by 3.98 points.
Close to the teams
Sarkar's game-by-game card gives Rutgers a two-score road win in Chestnut Hill.
On the Banks · June 25 ↗Hass marks Rutgers as a Boston College win in his game-by-game season forecast.
Boston.com · Sept. 3 ↗Final · Missouri 38 · Kansas 21
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 49.0 points, 1.2 from the 50.3 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Missouri 27, Kansas 25, with Missouri at 57.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Missouri 27, Kansas 26: Missouri by 1.7, with a 54.0% win probability. Against its captured Missouri −5.5 line, the model gap favors Kansas by 3.77 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Greenstein expects the renewed rivalry to stay close, with Missouri pulling it out late.
KU Sports · Sept. 10 ↗Week 2 slate
Final · Oregon 31 · Oklahoma State 39
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Oregon −25, leaving a 2.50-point gap from that number.
The model projects 56.5 points, 1.0 from the 57.5 market consensus.
The unchanged production forecast has Oregon by 21.9, creating a 0.60-point Oklahoma State lean at this price. The reviewed fair line adds 3.3 points to Oregon and keeps the game in the higher-uncertainty group.
Oklahoma State's rebuilt defense projects for below-average pass disruption, a favorable matchup for Dante Moore's timing and downfield efficiency. The staff and bounce-back evidence support the remaining adjustment.
Cassity's recent defenses created above-average pressure, and Oklahoma State's eight failed possessions against Tulsa leave real backdoor risk if its ball security improves.
Pass havoc counts sacks and passes defended per dropback. Moore averaged a 183.1 passer rating against his seven lower-havoc FBS opponents in 2025 and 145.8 against the upper half. Oklahoma State produced one disrupted pass and no sacks on 24 Tulsa dropbacks, while coordinator Skyler Cassity's recent defenses suggest a more conservative 14% to 16% range.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Oregon 37, Oklahoma State 16, with Oregon at 90.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Oregon 34, Oklahoma State 17: Oregon by 17.6, with a 84.3% win probability. Against its captured Oregon −22.5 line, the model gap favors Oklahoma State by 4.94 points.
Close to the teams
ATQ does not publish a betting pick here. We infer Oklahoma State at roughly −10.2 on a neutral-field power scale, four points below the −6.2 strength implied by Oregon −23.5. The rebuilt line and failed perimeter game cut the Cowboys to 14.0 points; the weak pass rush and explosive-pass exposure lift Oregon to 41.5.
Addicted To Quack · Sept. 11 · underlying film study ↗Postins' season scorecard gives the Cowboys enough offense to compete but not enough stops to win.
Oklahoma State Cowboys On SI · Aug. 12 ↗Final · Arizona State 20 · Texas A&M 48
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at DraftKings. The fair line is Arizona State +12.85, leaving a 1.65-point gap from that number.
The model projects 49.8 points, 0.5 from the 50.3 market consensus.
Efficiency, line play and finishing estimates all pull this projection toward Arizona State. Taking more than two touchdowns leaves room above the matchup fair line.
The broader game context pulls toward Texas A&M; Arizona State still projects to lose the game.
Both head coaches return from last season. The combined QB, coaching and roster uncertainty is near the middle of this week’s slate.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Arizona State 17, Texas A&M 35, with Texas A&M at 87.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Arizona State 14, Texas A&M 38: Texas A&M by 24.5, with a 92.0% win probability. Against its captured Texas A&M −14.5 line, the model gap favors Texas A&M by 9.99 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Arnold expects the Aggies' defense to decide a close, low-scoring game while the offense remains uneven.
Dave Campbell's Texas Football · Sept. 10 ↗Final · South Florida 28 · Army 24
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Army −4.87, leaving a 1.37-point gap from that number.
The model projects 45.9 points, 0.9 from the 46.8 market consensus.
Line play and efficiency profiles support Army, with a smaller contribution from pass disruption. Together they support Army by nearly five.
The defensive response curves pull against Army. At four points, the remaining price advantage is too small.
South Florida has new coach Brian Hartline. QB evidence, coaching continuity and roster turnover make this game less predictable than most of the slate.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects South Florida 23, Army 31, with Army at 69.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects South Florida 28, Army 27: South Florida by 1.0, with a 52.2% win probability. Against its captured Army −3.5 line, the model gap favors South Florida by 4.45 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Oklahoma 10 · Michigan 17
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Oklahoma −6.46, leaving a 0.96-point gap from that number.
The model projects 42.9 points, 0.6 from the 43.5 market consensus.
Week 1 moved the football estimate toward Oklahoma by 6.9 points. The market moved the same way, but the model still finds 1.0 points on Oklahoma.
Oklahoma: John Mateer, projected rating 143.5. Michigan: Bryce Underwood, projected rating 140.7.
Michigan has new coach Kyle Whittingham. The combined QB, coaching and roster uncertainty is near the middle of this week’s slate.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Oklahoma 27, Michigan 20, with Oklahoma at 67.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Oklahoma 21, Michigan 24: Michigan by 3.1, with a 57.1% win probability. Against its captured Oklahoma −5.5 line, the model gap favors Michigan by 8.61 points.
Close to the teams
John Williams, Aaron Gelvin and Jaron Spor all take the Sooners in the staff's schedule predictions.
Sooners Wire · Aug. 29 ↗Durand's bold-predictions card calls for Michigan to avenge last season's loss to Oklahoma.
Maize n Brew · Aug. 25 ↗Final · Old Dominion 21 · Virginia Tech 44
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 49.0 points, 1.2 from the 50.3 market consensus.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Old Dominion 14, Virginia Tech 35, with Virginia Tech at 91.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Old Dominion 16, Virginia Tech 38: Virginia Tech by 21.9, with a 89.6% win probability. Against its captured Virginia Tech −19.5 line, the model gap favors Virginia Tech by 2.45 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Coleman expects the Hokies to handle ODU behind the deeper roster and a cleaner offensive day.
TechSideline · Sept. 9 ↗Final · Penn State 27 · Temple 9
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 50.3 points, 0.5 from the 49.8 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Penn State 39, Temple 17, with Penn State at 92.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Penn State 38, Temple 21: Penn State by 16.6, with a 83.0% win probability. Against its captured Penn State −23.5 line, the model gap favors Temple by 6.89 points.
Close to the teams
All three writers pick Penn State, with projected scores of 27–13, 33–10 and 38–10.
Penn State Nittany Lions On SI · Aug. 30 ↗This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Washington State 7 · Kansas State 34
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 49.1 points, 0.4 from the 48.8 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Washington State 16, Kansas State 35, with Kansas State at 88.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Washington State 17, Kansas State 31: Kansas State by 14.7, with a 80.1% win probability. Against its captured Kansas State −18.5 line, the model gap favors Washington State by 3.79 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · App State 27 · East Carolina 24
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 55.1 points, 1.4 from the 56.5 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects App State 26, East Carolina 27, with East Carolina at 54.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects App State 27, East Carolina 30: East Carolina by 3.1, with a 57.1% win probability. Against its captured East Carolina −7.5 line, the model gap favors App State by 4.40 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Wake Forest 38 · Purdue 36
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 50.0 points, 0.2 from the 49.8 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Wake Forest 23, Purdue 26, with Purdue at 55.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Wake Forest 24, Purdue 27: Purdue by 2.0, with a 54.5% win probability. Against its captured Wake Forest −3 line, the model gap favors Purdue by 4.99 points.
Close to the teams
Bridgers' season outlook marks the Purdue trip as a Wake Forest win.
Blogger So Dear · Aug. 27 ↗This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Western Kentucky 20 · Georgia 70
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Georgia −41.57, leaving a 1.07-point gap from that number.
The model projects 54.6 points, 0.9 from the 55.5 market consensus.
Week 1 moved the football estimate toward Georgia by 4.4 points. The market moved the same way, but the model still finds 1.1 points on Georgia.
Western Kentucky: Rodney Tisdale Jr., projected rating 130.9. Georgia: Gunner Stockton, projected rating 151.3.
Both head coaches return from last season. The available QB, coaching and roster evidence puts this game among the slate’s more stable matchups.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Western Kentucky 5, Georgia 49, with Georgia at 100.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Western Kentucky 7, Georgia 49: Georgia by 43.7, with a 99.4% win probability. Against its captured Georgia −40.5 line, the model gap favors Georgia by 3.23 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · UL Monroe 20 · UAB 26
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is UAB −11.88, leaving a 2.38-point gap from that number.
The model projects 55.4 points, 0.3 from the 55.8 market consensus.
Week 1 moved the football estimate toward UAB by 4.9 points. The market moved the same way, but the model still finds 2.1 points on UAB.
UL Monroe: Aidan Armenta, projected rating 125.8. UAB: Ryder Burton, projected rating 124.1.
Both head coaches return from last season. The combined QB, coaching and roster uncertainty is near the middle of this week’s slate.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects UL Monroe 18, UAB 38, with UAB at 89.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects UL Monroe 21, UAB 35: UAB by 14.2, with a 79.2% win probability. Against its captured UAB −10 line, the model gap favors UAB by 4.17 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Duke 31 · Illinois 27
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Illinois −6.99, leaving a 1.49-point gap from that number.
The model projects 50.9 points, 0.6 from the 51.5 market consensus.
Line play is the largest contributor to the move toward Illinois. Efficiency and the defensive response estimates also support laying fewer than six points.
Pass-disruption estimates lean slightly toward Duke. Laying six would leave less than the required one-point edge.
Both head coaches return from last season. The combined QB, coaching and roster uncertainty is near the middle of this week’s slate.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Duke 26, Illinois 30, with Illinois at 58.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Duke 28, Illinois 34: Illinois by 4.9, with a 61.2% win probability. Against its captured Illinois −6 line, the model gap favors Duke by 1.06 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Cohn backs the Illini to cover and expects their defense to hold Duke near 20 points.
The Champaign Room · Sept. 10 ↗Final · UTSA 31 · Texas State 26
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is UTSA +0.89, leaving a 0.61-point gap from that number.
The model projects 64.2 points, 2.1 from the 66.3 market consensus.
Week 1 moved the football estimate toward UTSA by 3.0 points. The market moved the same way, but the model still finds 0.6 points on UTSA.
UTSA: Owen McCown, projected rating 144.8. Texas State: Brad Jackson, projected rating 148.9.
Both head coaches return from last season. The available QB, coaching and roster evidence puts this game among the slate’s more stable matchups.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects UTSA 36, Texas State 28, with UTSA at 69.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects UTSA 34, Texas State 31: UTSA by 3.0, with a 56.9% win probability. Against its captured Texas State −1.5 line, the model gap favors UTSA by 4.54 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Arizona 17 · BYU 28
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 47.4 points, 0.4 from the 47.8 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Arizona 23, BYU 29, with BYU at 66.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Arizona 20, BYU 31: BYU by 11.2, with a 73.9% win probability. Against its captured BYU −7.5 line, the model gap favors BYU by 3.66 points.
Close to the teams
Four of six staff writers pick BYU in a split panel; the two Arizona calls are 35–24 and 24–20.
Arizona Desert Swarm · Sept. 10 ↗This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Alabama 45 · Kentucky 17
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 49.2 points, 0.1 from the 49.3 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Alabama 28, Kentucky 19, with Alabama at 71.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Alabama 28, Kentucky 20: Alabama by 8.7, with a 69.1% win probability. Against its captured Alabama −10.5 line, the model gap favors Kentucky by 1.81 points.
Close to the teams
Nicholas expects Kentucky's offense to struggle to sustain enough drives against Alabama.
TideFans.com · Sept. 7 ↗This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · California 21 · Syracuse 18
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 55.3 points, 1.2 from the 56.5 market consensus.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects California 22, Syracuse 31, with Syracuse at 71.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects California 24, Syracuse 28: Syracuse by 4.4, with a 59.9% win probability. Against its captured Syracuse −3.5 line, the model gap favors Syracuse by 0.88 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Wall gives Syracuse a four-point home win in a matchup he expects to remain competitive throughout.
Troy Nunes Is An Absolute Magician · Sept. 10 ↗Final · UCF 7 · Pittsburgh 12
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 54.8 points, 1.7 from the 56.5 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects UCF 22, Pittsburgh 29, with Pittsburgh at 66.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects UCF 21, Pittsburgh 30: Pittsburgh by 8.8, with a 69.3% win probability. Against its captured Pittsburgh −7 line, the model gap favors Pittsburgh by 1.81 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Utah State 14 · Washington 16
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 55.2 points, 0.3 from the 55.5 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Utah State 12, Washington 38, with Washington at 95.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Utah State 14, Washington 38: Washington by 23.7, with a 91.3% win probability. Against its captured Washington −26.5 line, the model gap favors Utah State by 2.83 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Gorman expects Washington's defense to force mistakes and keep Utah State from generating enough explosive plays.
UW Dawg Pound · Sept. 9 ↗Final · Maryland 38 · UConn 14
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 51.9 points, 0.6 from the 52.5 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Maryland 32, UConn 19, with Maryland at 79.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Maryland 31, UConn 24: Maryland by 7.8, with a 67.3% win probability. Against its captured Maryland −12.5 line, the model gap favors UConn by 4.70 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Eastern Michigan 7 · Michigan State 35
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 49.6 points, 0.2 from the 49.8 market consensus.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Eastern Michigan 16, Michigan State 35, with Michigan State at 88.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Eastern Michigan 20, Michigan State 34: Michigan State by 14.8, with a 80.3% win probability. Against its captured Michigan State −17.5 line, the model gap favors Eastern Michigan by 2.67 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Cotsonika's game-by-game card projects a comfortable in-state win for the Spartans.
Michigan State Spartans On SI · July 29 ↗Final · Rice 0 · Notre Dame 52
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 55.3 points, 0.1 from the 55.3 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Rice 6, Notre Dame 46, with Notre Dame at 99.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Rice 7, Notre Dame 49: Notre Dame by 44.4, with a 99.5% win probability. Against its captured Notre Dame −44.5 line, the model gap favors Rice by 0.09 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Mississippi State 38 · Minnesota 13
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 52.5 points, 2.7 from the 55.3 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Mississippi State 25, Minnesota 27, with Minnesota at 57.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Mississippi State 27, Minnesota 24: Mississippi State by 1.5, with a 53.3% win probability. Against its captured Mississippi State −1.5 line, the model gap favors Minnesota by 0.04 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026The game preview's three keys culminate in a Minnesota win over Mississippi State.
The Daily Gopher · Sept. 10 ↗Final · UNLV 6 · North Texas 44
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is North Texas +2.29, leaving a 1.21-point gap from that number.
The model projects 55.9 points, 0.9 from the 56.8 market consensus.
Line play is the largest contribution toward North Texas, with efficiency and finishing also helping. Taking more than a field goal clears the price requirement.
The broader game context favors UNLV. At +3, the remaining edge would be less than one point.
North Texas has new coach Neal Brown. QB evidence, coaching continuity and roster turnover make this game less predictable than most of the slate.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects UNLV 36, North Texas 23, with UNLV at 79.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects UNLV 38, North Texas 31: UNLV by 6.4, with a 64.3% win probability. Against its captured UNLV −3.5 line, the model gap favors UNLV by 2.88 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Delaware 26 · Vanderbilt 35
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 53.7 points, 1.1 from the 54.8 market consensus.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Delaware 17, Vanderbilt 40, with Vanderbilt at 92.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Delaware 20, Vanderbilt 42: Vanderbilt by 23.7, with a 91.3% win probability. Against its captured Vanderbilt −20.5 line, the model gap favors Vanderbilt by 3.15 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Dwyer expects Vanderbilt to pull away by establishing control around three matchup keys.
VandySports · Sept. 10 ↗Final · Memphis 20 · Boise State 38
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Memphis +7.07, leaving a 2.43-point gap from that number.
The model projects 52.8 points, 1.9 from the 54.8 market consensus.
Efficiency and finishing profiles give Memphis the largest matchup adjustment among the eligible underdogs. The offered spread leaves the largest price advantage on this added card.
The defensive response curves pull modestly toward Boise State. This is a points recommendation; Boise State remains the projected winner.
Memphis has new coach Charles Huff. QB evidence, coaching continuity and roster turnover make this game less predictable than most of the slate.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Memphis 25, Boise State 31, with Boise State at 64.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Memphis 27, Boise State 31: Boise State by 5.2, with a 61.7% win probability. Against its captured Boise State −8.5 line, the model gap favors Memphis by 3.33 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Nix's season scorecard projects a close home win for the Broncos.
Boise State Broncos On SI · Sept. 4 ↗Final · Jacksonville State 27 · Ohio 29
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Ohio −4.58, leaving a 2.08-point gap from that number.
The model projects 50.2 points, 0.3 from the 50.5 market consensus.
Week 1 moved the football estimate toward Ohio by 3.6 points. The market moved the same way, but the model still finds 1.8 points on Ohio.
Jacksonville State: Caden Creel, projected rating 138.6. Ohio: Nick Poulos, projected rating 118.5.
Both head coaches return from last season. The combined QB, coaching and roster uncertainty is near the middle of this week’s slate.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Jacksonville State 28, Ohio 21, with Jacksonville State at 67.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Jacksonville State 27, Ohio 26: Jacksonville State by 1.2, with a 52.8% win probability. Against its captured Ohio −3 line, the model gap favors Jacksonville State by 4.23 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Buffalo 20 · Florida International 33
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at DraftKings. The fair line is Buffalo +8.98, leaving a 1.52-point gap from that number.
The model projects 46.9 points, 0.6 from the 47.5 market consensus.
The market moved 2.1 points toward Florida International, farther than the Week 1 performance update supports. The model buys back 1.3 points on Buffalo.
Buffalo: Elijah Holmes, projected rating 114.7. Florida International: JJ Kohl (transfer), projected rating 134.2.
Both head coaches return from last season. QB evidence, coaching continuity and roster turnover make this game less predictable than most of the slate.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Buffalo 24, Florida International 24, with Florida International at 51.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Buffalo 27, Florida International 28: Florida International by 0.1, with a 50.2% win probability. Against its captured Florida International −10.5 line, the model gap favors Buffalo by 10.41 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Georgia State 31 · Kennesaw State 17
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Georgia State +8.26, leaving a 1.24-point gap from that number.
The model projects 53.6 points, 0.9 from the 54.5 market consensus.
Line play and conversion efficiency are the main reasons to take Georgia State. They outweigh a weaker contribution from the broader efficiency profile.
The overall efficiency component leans toward Kennesaw State; the case depends more heavily on line play and finishing.
Both head coaches return from last season. QB evidence, coaching continuity and roster turnover make this game less predictable than most of the slate.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Georgia State 19, Kennesaw State 36, with Kennesaw State at 87.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Georgia State 24, Kennesaw State 31: Kennesaw State by 7.6, with a 66.9% win probability. Against its captured Kennesaw State −9.5 line, the model gap favors Georgia State by 1.86 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Tennessee 45 · Georgia Tech 24
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 54.6 points, 0.9 from the 55.5 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Tennessee 35, Georgia Tech 20, with Tennessee at 84.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Tennessee 35, Georgia Tech 27: Tennessee by 8.7, with a 69.0% win probability. Against its captured Tennessee −12.5 line, the model gap favors Georgia Tech by 3.84 points.
Close to the teams
Sharyon expects Tennessee to cover behind the stronger passing game and defensive front.
Rocky Top Insider · Sept. 10 ↗This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Middle Tennessee 26 · Marshall 28
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 56.3 points, 1.0 from the 57.3 market consensus.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Middle Tennessee 25, Marshall 34, with Marshall at 71.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Middle Tennessee 27, Marshall 34: Marshall by 7.7, with a 67.1% win probability. Against its captured Marshall −13.5 line, the model gap favors Middle Tennessee by 5.79 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · South Alabama 24 · Tulane 28
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 48.8 points, 0.7 from the 49.5 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects South Alabama 23, Tulane 29, with Tulane at 66.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects South Alabama 27, Tulane 34: Tulane by 7.8, with a 67.4% win probability. Against its captured Tulane −9.5 line, the model gap favors South Alabama by 1.66 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Both season forecasts pick Tulane; one expects a two- or three-touchdown win and the other a lower-scoring result.
Tulane Green Wave On SI · Aug. 17 ↗Final · Bowling Green 7 · Nebraska 56
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 51.3 points, 0.4 from the 51.8 market consensus.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Bowling Green 10, Nebraska 38, with Nebraska at 96.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Bowling Green 10, Nebraska 38: Nebraska by 27.6, with a 94.3% win probability. Against its captured Nebraska −28.5 line, the model gap favors Bowling Green by 0.94 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026The preview lays out five reasons Nebraska should win, led by the trenches and home-field setting.
Corn Nation · Sept. 10 ↗Final · Tulsa 23 · Sam Houston 17
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 51.7 points, 0.2 from the 51.5 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Tulsa 35, Sam Houston 18, with Tulsa at 85.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Tulsa 35, Sam Houston 20: Tulsa by 15.2, with a 80.8% win probability. Against its captured Tulsa −13.5 line, the model gap favors Tulsa by 1.66 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · San Diego State 10 · UCLA 28
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is San Diego State +10.74, leaving a 1.26-point gap from that number.
The model projects 54.2 points, 1.0 from the 55.3 market consensus.
Line play and conversion efficiency account for most of the move toward San Diego State. The matchup forecast makes the game closer than UCLA by twelve.
The overall efficiency advantage is small, and the pass-disruption component leans toward UCLA.
UCLA has new coach Bob Chesney. QB evidence, coaching continuity and roster turnover make this game less predictable than most of the slate.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects San Diego State 22, UCLA 30, with UCLA at 71.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects San Diego State 20, UCLA 28: UCLA by 9.1, with a 69.8% win probability. Against its captured UCLA −11.5 line, the model gap favors San Diego State by 2.45 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Navy 30 · Florida Atlantic 38
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Florida Atlantic +3.45, leaving a 1.55-point gap from that number.
The model projects 55.7 points, 2.8 from the 58.5 market consensus.
The market moved 4.1 points toward Navy, farther than the Week 1 performance update supports. The model buys back 1.3 points on Florida Atlantic.
Navy: Braxton Woodson, projected rating 124.5. Florida Atlantic: Caden Veltkamp, projected rating 140.7.
Both head coaches return from last season. The combined QB, coaching and roster uncertainty is near the middle of this week’s slate.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Navy 37, Florida Atlantic 23, with Navy at 80.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Navy 34, Florida Atlantic 31: Navy by 2.6, with a 56.0% win probability. Against its captured Navy −4.5 line, the model gap favors Florida Atlantic by 1.86 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Georgia Southern 7 · Clemson 22
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Georgia Southern +19.10, leaving a 1.40-point gap from that number.
The model projects 55.8 points, 0.1 from the 55.8 market consensus.
Week 1 moved the football estimate toward Georgia Southern by 5.4 points. The market moved the same way, but the model still finds 1.4 points on Georgia Southern.
Georgia Southern: Max Johnson (transfer), projected rating 125.2. Clemson: Christopher Vizzina, projected rating 138.3.
Both head coaches return from last season. The available QB, coaching and roster evidence puts this game among the slate’s more stable matchups.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Georgia Southern 19, Clemson 33, with Clemson at 80.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Georgia Southern 17, Clemson 38: Clemson by 22.3, with a 90.0% win probability. Against its captured Clemson −20.5 line, the model gap favors Clemson by 1.85 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026The full staff picks Clemson; Zach Lentz's game-by-game score is 41–10.
Clemson Sports Media · Aug. 27 ↗Final · Ohio State 23 · Texas 24
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at DraftKings. The fair line is Texas −2.86, leaving a 1.36-point gap from that number.
The model projects 47.5 points, 2.0 from the 49.5 market consensus.
Week 1 moved the football estimate toward Texas by 4.7 points. The market moved the same way, but the model still finds 1.1 points on Texas.
Ohio State: Julian Sayin, projected rating 164.7. Texas: Arch Manning, projected rating 157.6.
Both head coaches return from last season. The available QB, coaching and roster evidence puts this game among the slate’s more stable matchups.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Ohio State 27, Texas 25, with Ohio State at 55.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Ohio State 21, Texas 28: Texas by 6.6, with a 64.9% win probability. Against its captured Texas −1.5 line, the model gap favors Texas by 5.15 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Iowa State 13 · Iowa 16
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Iowa State +13.45, leaving a 0.55-point gap from that number.
The model projects 40.5 points, 0.0 from the 40.5 market consensus.
The market moved 3.2 points toward Iowa, farther than the Week 1 performance update supports. The model buys back 0.5 points on Iowa State.
Iowa State: Jaylen Raynor (transfer), projected rating 134.2. Iowa: Hank Brown, projected rating 118.9.
Iowa State has new coach Jimmy Rogers. QB evidence, coaching continuity and roster turnover make this game less predictable than most of the slate.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Iowa State 14, Iowa 32, with Iowa at 86.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Iowa State 17, Iowa 31: Iowa by 15.3, with a 81.0% win probability. Against its captured Iowa −14 line, the model gap favors Iowa by 1.28 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026The panel's consensus score is Iowa 30, Iowa State 13, backing both the Hawkeyes and the over.
Black Heart Gold Pants · Sept. 11 ↗Final · Texas Tech 35 · Oregon State 24
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 54.2 points, 0.5 from the 53.8 market consensus.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Texas Tech 36, Oregon State 13, with Texas Tech at 93.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Texas Tech 34, Oregon State 14: Texas Tech by 19.1, with a 86.3% win probability. Against its captured Texas Tech −26.5 line, the model gap favors Oregon State by 7.41 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Louisiana Tech 14 · LSU 45
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 54.9 points, 0.8 from the 55.8 market consensus.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Louisiana Tech 10, LSU 40, with LSU at 97.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Louisiana Tech 7, LSU 42: LSU by 36.2, with a 98.1% win probability. Against its captured LSU −35.5 line, the model gap favors LSU by 0.66 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026All three season forecasts mark Louisiana Tech as an LSU win.
Crain & Company · Aug. 7 ↗Final · Southern Miss 8 · Auburn 43
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Auburn −35.01, leaving a 1.51-point gap from that number.
The model projects 56.5 points, 0.0 from the 56.5 market consensus.
The defensive response estimates and broader efficiency profile support Auburn extending the margin beyond the offered spread.
Finishing estimates and the independent similar-game model favor Southern Miss. The model still qualifies Auburn, but those signals do not provide extra confirmation.
Auburn has new coach Alex Golesh. The combined QB, coaching and roster uncertainty is near the middle of this week’s slate.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Southern Miss 13, Auburn 37, with Auburn at 94.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Southern Miss 14, Auburn 38: Auburn by 24.7, with a 92.2% win probability. Against its captured Auburn −33.5 line, the model gap favors Southern Miss by 8.76 points.
Close to the teams
Both Southern Miss season forecasts mark the trip to Auburn as a loss.
Southern Miss Golden Eagles On SI · Aug. 20 ↗Both writers forecast a rout, with projected scores of 59–14 and 66–10.
Auburn Tigers On SI · Sept. 5 ↗Final · Charlotte 9 · Ole Miss 41
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 59.9 points, 0.6 from the 60.5 market consensus.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects Charlotte 7, Ole Miss 49, with Ole Miss at 100.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Charlotte 10, Ole Miss 48: Ole Miss by 39.0, with a 98.7% win probability. Against its captured Ole Miss −47.5 line, the model gap favors Charlotte by 8.53 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Trammel's game-by-game season forecast treats Charlotte as an Ole Miss win.
Ole Miss Rebels On SI · Sept. 4 ↗Final · North Dakota State 38 · Air Force 32
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is Air Force +1.50, leaving a 1.00-point gap from that number.
The model projects 45.8 points, 1.4 from the 47.3 market consensus.
The broader efficiency profile and defensive response estimates make Air Force a smaller underdog than the book does.
Conversion efficiency pulls against Air Force. The edge at +2.5 is only 1.00 point, so a half-point move ends the recommendation.
North Dakota State has new coach Tim Polasek. QB evidence, coaching continuity and roster turnover make this game less predictable than most of the slate.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects North Dakota State 25, Air Force 26, with Air Force at 52.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects North Dakota State 28, Air Force 27: North Dakota State by 0.2, with a 50.5% win probability. Against its captured North Dakota State −2.5 line, the model gap favors Air Force by 2.26 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Arkansas 10 · Utah 43
All-Takes projections
The Week 2 side model stays at the market for this matchup, so the pass remains visible instead of disappearing from the board.
The model projects 53.0 points, 1.8 from the 54.8 market consensus.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Arkansas 23, Utah 35, with Utah at 78.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Arkansas 27, Utah 35: Utah by 8.4, with a 68.4% win probability. Against its captured Utah −12.5 line, the model gap favors Arkansas by 4.14 points.
Close to the teams
Throne expects Utah to win but backs Arkansas to stay well inside the number.
4th & Five · Sept. 9 ↗This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Sacramento State 3 · Fresno State 49
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at DraftKings. The fair line is Sacramento State +17.00, leaving a 1.50-point gap from that number.
The model projects 45.2 points, 0.0 from the 45.3 market consensus.
The market moved 2.3 points toward Fresno State, farther than the Week 1 performance update supports. The model buys back 1.2 points on Sacramento State.
Sacramento State: Jackson Sharman, projected rating 119.9. Fresno State: Jayden Mandal, projected rating 119.8.
Sacramento State has new coach Alonzo Carter. QB evidence, coaching continuity and roster turnover make this game less predictable than most of the slate.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Sacramento State 17, Fresno State 31, with Fresno State at 81.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Sacramento State 20, Fresno State 28: Fresno State by 8.2, with a 68.2% win probability. Against its captured Fresno State −18.5 line, the model gap favors Sacramento State by 10.26 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · Louisiana 30 · USC 49
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at DraftKings. The fair line is USC −33.25, leaving a 2.75-point gap from that number.
The model projects 58.8 points, 0.7 from the 59.5 market consensus.
Week 1 moved the football estimate toward USC by 3.7 points. The market moved the same way, but the model still finds 2.5 points on USC.
Louisiana: Lunch Winfield, projected rating 137.4. USC: Jayden Maiava, projected rating 158.5.
Both head coaches return from last season. The available QB, coaching and roster evidence puts this game among the slate’s more stable matchups.
The wider argument
This matchup was not on Bud Elliott, Chip Patterson, Danny Kanell or Tom Fornelli’s Week 2 lists.
SP+ projects Louisiana 16, USC 42, with USC at 95.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects Louisiana 14, USC 45: USC by 30.4, with a 95.9% win probability. Against its captured USC −30.5 line, the model gap favors Louisiana by 0.12 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Final · New Mexico State 19 · Hawai'i 29
All-Takes projections
Best saved price at Bovada. The fair line is New Mexico State +6.27, leaving a 1.73-point gap from that number.
The model projects 49.2 points, 0.5 from the 49.8 market consensus.
Week 1 moved the football estimate toward New Mexico State by 6.1 points. The market moved the same way, but the model still finds 1.2 points on New Mexico State.
New Mexico State: Trey Hedden (transfer), projected rating 130.0. Hawai'i: Micah Alejado, projected rating 133.5.
Both head coaches return from last season. The available QB, coaching and roster evidence puts this game among the slate’s more stable matchups.
The wider argument
The number and market shown are the ones used on the show.
SP+ projects New Mexico State 21, Hawai'i 31, with Hawai'i at 74.0% to win. The rounded score is the center of a range, not an exact-score call.
CFPi+ projects New Mexico State 24, Hawai'i 34: Hawai'i by 9.3, with a 70.4% win probability. Against its captured Hawai'i −8.5 line, the model gap favors Hawai'i by 0.82 points.
Close to the teams
This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026This fixed slot remains visible so missing local coverage is not mistaken for agreement, disagreement or a prediction from the team’s beat.
Perspective preserved · checked through Sept. 11, 2026Source notes
All-Takes ATS. The current card contains 23 side recommendations. The other 26 games say Pass explicitly.
All-Takes totals. The totals model recommends 6 overs and 26 unders. Its 17 passes stay on the board.
SP+. The published Sept. 8 Week 2 sheet supplies a rounded projected score, margin and win probability for every matchup above.
CFBPredictor. The locked CFPi+ V2026.2 board supplies a projected score, win probability and market gap for all 49 matchups. Its DraftKings lines were captured at the Sept. 8 at 2:29 p.m. ET snapshot; the displayed gap is model disagreement rather than a betting recommendation.
Cover 3. The four main hosts made 53 board-relevant Week 2 plays across 28 matchups in the Sept. 10 locks episode, including first-half, quarter, team-total and moneyline-sprinkle markets. Tom Fornelli’s Wofford spread and moneyline plays are the two episode calls outside this FBS-vs-FBS board. Club Kenz, dentist and producer segments are not included because an independently checkable pick list was not available at this update.
Injury news. Team and local reporting supply the primary availability evidence, with explicit quarterback and coach searches for both sides. Covers is retained as a supplement. Confirmed pregame starter changes rebuild the quarterback input; a mismatch holds the side until the new starter is reconciled.
Local reads. We sourced 29 matchup-specific calls from team-focused and local outlets, plus one explicitly labeled All-Takes inference from ATQ’s Oklahoma State film study, while preserving all 98 team-perspective slots. A blank side is an unsuccessful search, not evidence that local writers agree or have no view.
Week 2 SP+ score sheet ↗CFBPredictor Week 2 board ↗Cover 3 Week 2 locks episode ↗Cover 3 pick recap ↗Before kickoff
Late quarterback news and line movement can erase a small edge. Use the team, named book and spread together. Confirm the current line and odds before betting.